LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015 | Volume
: 10 | Issue : 3 | Page : 217--218
Is fludeoxyglucose-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) really useless in staging pulmonary carcinoid tumors and in discriminating histological subtypes? Controversial points and future perspectives
Filippo Lococo1, Alessandro Stefani2, Giorgio Treglia3,
1 Unit of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS-Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
2 Unit of Thoracic Surgery, University of Modena, Modena, Italy
3 Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Center, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland, Europe, Switzerland
Correspondence Address:
Filippo Lococo
Unit of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS-Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia
Italy
How to cite this article:
Lococo F, Stefani A, Treglia G. Is fludeoxyglucose-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) really useless in staging pulmonary carcinoid tumors and in discriminating histological subtypes? Controversial points and future perspectives.Ann Thorac Med 2015;10:217-218
|
How to cite this URL:
Lococo F, Stefani A, Treglia G. Is fludeoxyglucose-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) really useless in staging pulmonary carcinoid tumors and in discriminating histological subtypes? Controversial points and future perspectives. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Nov 24 ];10:217-218
Available from: https://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2015/10/3/217/157292 |
Full Text
.
|
|
|
