Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents   
EDITORIAL
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 53-54
The Saudi guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A fresh "Real-World" approach to COPD


Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

Date of Submission01-Mar-2014
Date of Acceptance07-Mar-2014
Date of Web Publication14-Mar-2014

Correspondence Address:
Nicola A Hanania
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
USA
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.128842

PMID: 24791167

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Hanania NA. The Saudi guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A fresh "Real-World" approach to COPD. Ann Thorac Med 2014;9:53-4

How to cite this URL:
Hanania NA. The Saudi guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A fresh "Real-World" approach to COPD. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Nov 25];9:53-4. Available from: https://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2014/9/2/53/128842


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA and throughout the world. [1],[2],[3] In spite of this, it remains a relatively neglected disease both in terms of public awareness and in public-health planning. The impact of COPD is particularly felt in developing countries despite the paucity of information on epidemiology and management of this disease in such countries. This impact was recently uncovered by the BREATHE study. [4],[5],[6],[7] The findings of this large epidemiological study conducted in 10 countries in the Middle East and North Africa, provided the first international collaborative attempt to document the prevalence and burden of COPD in that region of the world. Its findings were derived from interviews of over 60,000 respondents in the general population. Although the prevalence of COPD in all participating countries combined was around 4%, this prevalence rate may be have been underestimated, especially since other risk factors frequent in that part of the world including water-pipe smoking and exposure to burning biomass fuel, were not considered in the determination of prevalence. Another important finding of the BREATHE study was the documentation of largely unsatisfactory standards of care in the different countries where it was conducted. Indeed, lesser than one-third of COPD cases were diagnosed, lesser than one-third evaluated for lung function, and lesser than one-third received appropriate treatment for COPD. In addition, less than 10% of treatment was compliant with the international GOLD guidelines. In addition to its human impact, COPD is responsible for considerable healthcare costs in that region as it is in other countries.

Several evidence-based clinical practice guidelines exist for COPD. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] However, these guidelines have been mainly a result of weighing evidence obtained from randomized controlled trials from developed countries. Therefore, such guidelines have been criticized to be of limited value when it comes to being implemented in the population at large in a real world setting and in developing countries. [16] This is especially true when it comes to many patients with multiple comorbidities who are very often excluded from trials used to weigh the evidence for such guidelines. Furthermore, many existing guidelines place unrealistic expectations from clinicians who are in need of simple practical recommendations they can adopt in their busy practices. It is therefore, not surprising that such guidelines are rarely adopted by practicing clinicians who constitute the forefront in managing COPD. [17],[18] Hence it is imperative that future clinical practice guidelines take into account the practical aspect and feasibility of complying with their recommendation.

The Saudi Thoracic Society (STS) Initiative for Chronic Airways Diseases' (SICAD) main aim has been to develop evidence-based guidelines which are more suitable to local practices in the aim to improve COPD awareness and optimize patient care by healthcare providers. These guidelines, which constitute the first initiative of the SICAD, were developed by a panel of academic and practicing pulmonologists who are experienced in developing guidelines. The panel used standard methodology and grading of evidence strategies incorporating studies published in developed countries, locally in Saudi Arabia and throughout the region. While these guidelines have many similarities to existing international COPD guidelines, they also have unique differences that make them more adaptable in the real-world setting.

The first asset of the STS guidelines is the recommendation to use a simplified clinical approach to COPD based on patient symptoms using the COPD assessment test score, and assessment of risk of exacerbations and comorbidities. While the guidelines continue to emphasize the need of spirometry for the initial diagnosis of COPD, they do not recommend the routine use of spirometry beyond that for further management. The rationale behind this recommendation stems from the fact that spirometry remains widely underutilized among primary care clinicians in Saudi Arabia as they are throughout the world, but also from the fact that physiologic measures such as forced expiratory volume in 1 s often poorly correlate with COPD patients' symptoms and health status. The underutilization of spirometry continues to be a major problem throughout the world and is a result of many myths that need to be resolved. [19] However, until this is done, it is hard to expect that this tool would be utilized on a routine basis among primary care providers.

The second asset of the Saudi guidelines is their simple classification of COPD severity that would be utilized for the stepwise pharmacologic approach to treatment of COPD. The guidelines recommend three classes for COPD (Class I-III) rather than the four grades recommended by GOLD (Grade A-C) [Table 1].
Table 1: STS classification of COPD

Click here to view


In addition to the above, the guidelines put forth very important recommendations for the assessment, non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches to managing COPD considering the availability of such interventions locally and in the region.

In summary, this SICAD's initiative in simplifying the approach to COPD by bringing forward evidence-based guidelines that can be implemented locally in various clinical settings is a major step that may lead to improve outcomes of patients suffering from this disease in the country. A major step now is to ensure that these recommendations be disseminated to all parties involved and more importantly implemented. Future studies that measure outcomes from implementing these guidelines are also warranted.

 
   References Top

1.Ford ES, Croft JB, Mannino DM, Wheaton AG, Zhang X, Giles WH. COPD surveillance - United States, 1999-2011. Chest 2013;144:284-305.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Hanania NA. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Respir Med 2012;106 Suppl 2:S1-2.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Holguin F, Folch E, Redd SC, Mannino DM. Comorbidity and mortality in COPD-related hospitalizations in the United States, 1979 to 2001. Chest 2005;128:2005-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.El Hasnaoui A, Rashid N, Lahlou A, Salhi H, Doble A, Nejjari C, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the adult population within the Middle East and North Africa region: Rationale and design of the BREATHE study. Respir Med 2012;106 Suppl 2:S3-15.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Idrees M, Koniski ML, Taright S, Shahrour N, Polatli M, Ben Kheder A, et al. Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Middle East and North Africa: Results of the BREATHE study. Respir Med 2012;106 Suppl 2:S33-44.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Polatli M, Ben Kheder A, Wali S, Javed A, Khattab A, Mahboub B, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and associated healthcare resource consumption in the Middle East and North Africa: The BREATHE study. Respir Med 2012;106 Suppl 2:S75-85.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Uzaslan E, Mahboub B, Beji M, Nejjari C, Tageldin MA, Khan JA, et al. The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Middle East and North Africa: Results of the BREATHE study. Respir Med 2012;106 Suppl 2:S45-59.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Gruffydd-Jones K, Loveridge C. The 2010 NICE COPD Guidelines: How do they compare with the GOLD guidelines? Prim Care Respir J 2011;20:199-204.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Rodríguez-Roisin R, Agustí A. The GOLD initiative 2011: A change of paradigm? Arch Bronconeumol 2012;48:286-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agustí AG, Jones PW, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:347-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Abdool-Gaffar MS, Ambaram A, Ainslie GM, Bolliger CT, Feldman C, Geffen L, et al. Guideline for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - 2011 update. S Afr Med J 2011;101:63-73.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Hanania NA, Marciniuk DD. A unified front against COPD: Clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Physicians, the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Thoracic Society, and the European Respiratory Society. Chest 2011;140:565-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Nici L, ZuWallack R, American Thoracic Society Subcommittee on Integrated Care of the COPD Patient. An official American Thoracic Society workshop report: The integrated care of the COPD patient. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:9-18.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Weinberger SE, Hanania NA, Criner G, van der Molen T, et al. Diagnosis and management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:179-91.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.O′Donnell DE, Hernandez P, Kaplan A, Aaron S, Bourbeau J, Marciniuk D, et al. Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-2008 update-highlights for primary care. Can Respir J 2008;15 Suppl A:1A-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Wong GW, Miravitlles M, Chisholm A, Krishnan J. Respiratory guidelines-which real world? Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014;11 Suppl 2:S85-91.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Perez X, Wisnivesky JP, Lurslurchachai L, Kleinman LC, Kronish IM. Barriers to adherence to COPD guidelines among primary care providers. Respir Med 2012;106:374-81.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Yawn BP. Optimizing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management in primary care. South Med J 2011;104:121-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Kaminsky DA, Marcy TW, Bachand M, Irvin CG. Knowledge and use of office spirometry for the detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by primary care physicians. Respir Care 2005;50:1639-48.  Back to cited text no. 19
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (273 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2843    
    Printed50    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded607    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal