ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2007 | Volume
: 2
| Issue : 4 | Page : 154-157 |
|
Comparison of acid-fast stain and culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pre- and post-bronchoscopy sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage in HIV-infected patients with atypical chest X-ray in Ethiopia
Getachew Aderaye1, Haimanot G/Egziabher2, Abraham Aseffa2, Alemayehu Worku3, Lars Lindquist4
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia; and Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Kaolinska Institute, Sweden 2 Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 3 Department of Community Health, Addis Ababa, University, Ethiopia 4 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institute at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
Correspondence Address:
Getachew Aderaye Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Kaolinska Institute, Sweden
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.36549
|
|
Background : Smear-negative tuberculosis occurs more frequently in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients than in non-HIV-infected patients. Besides, there are substantial numbers of patients who cannot produce sputum, making the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) difficult.
Aims : To evaluate the relative yield of pre- and post-bronchoscopy sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in 'sputum smear'-negative, HIV-positive patients.
Settings : A tertiary care referral hospital in Addis Ababa.
Materials and Methods : Acid-fast stain (AFS) using the concentration technique was done on 85 pre-bronchoscopy sputum and 120 BAL samples. Direct AFS was done on all BAL and 117 post-bronchoscopy sputum samples. Culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) was done for all sputa and BAL.
Results : MTB was isolated from 26 (21.7%), 23 (19.7%) and 13 (15.3%) of BAL, post- and pre-bronchoscopy sputum cultures respectively. AFS on pre-bronchoscopy sputum using concentration technique and direct AFS on BAL together detected 11 (41%) of the 27 culture-positive cases. In patients who could produce sputum, the sensitivity of pre-bronchoscopy sputum culture (13/85, 15.3%) was comparable to BAL (12/85, 14%) and post-bronchoscopy sputum (12/85, 14%). In patients who could not produce sputum, however, both BAL (12/35, 40%) and post-bronchoscopy sputum (12/32, 31.4%) detected significantly more patients than those who could produce sputum ( P =0.002, P =0.028 respectively).
Conclusion: In HIV-infected patients, AFS by concentration method on pre-bronchoscopy sputum and direct AFS on BAL in patients who cannot produce sputum are the preferred methods of making a rapid diagnosis. BAL culture seems to add little value in patients who can produce sputum; therefore, bronchoscopy should be deferred under such circumstances. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|