Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents   
EDITORIAL
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 125-126
Bronchiolitis in children: The Saudi initiative of bronchiolitis diagnosis, management, and prevention (SIBRO)


Division of Neonatology and NICU, S.Anna Obstetrics and Neonatology Hospital, Torino, Italy

Date of Submission08-May-2018
Date of Acceptance09-May-2018
Date of Web Publication18-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Paolo Manzoni
Neonatology and NICU, S. Anna Hospital, Torino
Italy
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/atm.ATM_137_18

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Manzoni P. Bronchiolitis in children: The Saudi initiative of bronchiolitis diagnosis, management, and prevention (SIBRO). Ann Thorac Med 2018;13:125-6

How to cite this URL:
Manzoni P. Bronchiolitis in children: The Saudi initiative of bronchiolitis diagnosis, management, and prevention (SIBRO). Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 14];13:125-6. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2018/13/3/125/236742




Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospital admissions in children <2 years of age worldwide, and is associated with a considerable burden of short- and long-term morbidity in the respiratory domain, as well as with high societal, parental, and health-care costs.[1]

This condition is well recognized and impacts heavily on the daily activities of pediatricians and on hospitals' overcrowding during seasonal epidemic peaks. However, adherence to structured, consistent, and authoritative guidelines has always been weak, leading to variability in the management and to prescriptions of medications and laboratory examinations not based on the evidence. Specific recommendations for the management of bronchiolitis have been issued by only a limited number of countries and national scientific societies so far. Such a limited availability of nationally designed and country-centered guidelines is a weakness that adds to the above-mentioned limited adherence.

As a result, it is no surprise that recent surveys and retrospective, cohort studies report a high variability of practices in the management of bronchiolitis as well as an unchanged attitude to overprescribe medications and laboratory/instrumental examinations that are not supported by the evidence.[2]

These findings underline, once more, the very limited adherence to the existing guidelines, and the need for improving the design, the implementation, and full awareness of these documents.

In this journal issue, the Saudi Initiative of Bronchiolitis (SIBRO) initiative document regarding the management of bronchiolitis in the KSA is published. This initiative is highly commendable for a number of reasons.

First, it is a national guideline. Adoption of external, imported guidelines may be problematic since the management of a specific morbid condition is always a mix of actions based on the published evidence, on the one hand, and the local perspectives/consolidated practice, on the other hand. The SIBRO document is tailored on a national background of practice and feasibility; thus, it qualifies for a high likelihood of widespread acceptance. Second, it is a multispecialistic document. Similar to what happened with the Italian Pediatric Guideline document on the management of bronchiolitis,[3] here experts of all different medical subspecialties in the care of bronchiolitis patients have been involved and have given their input and expertise. This is a major strength since – by definition – bronchiolitis is a disease that needs a common, shared approach by several pediatric specialists (neonatologists, pulmonologists, infectologists, etc.).

The document has many strengths: a major one being the goal of ensuring consistency to a number of practices that remain debated or that may even be misinterpreted or misled. An example is the approach toward oxygen saturation monitoring and detection. The document endorses a critical interpretation of the oxygen saturation measurements. This is critical since the adoption – as an example – of different lower thresholds of saturation can highly impact on the hospitalization rates. Importantly, this document underlines the need to improve the accuracy of the measurements (as an example, by cleaning the nares of the infant before measuring saturation) and to consider these measurements always in light of the additional clinical data that can arise from the visit and assessment of each single patient. The same applies to the suggestion of adopting a consistent, stable, and validated scoring system, in order to overcome possible misinterpretation of the severity of the disease in specific patients and settings.[4]

Notoriously, management of bronchiolitis is mainly supportive and consists of oxygen administration, clearing the nasal airway secretions, and fluid balance maintenance. Even though these points appear known and well received, a clear need to reconfirm these statements in an official document still exists, since authoritative guidance at this level is sought by clinicians. The SIBRO document includes a long breakdown of all drugs and medications that have been proposed for the treatment of bronchiolitis, and that proved not effective – and therefore not recommendable for routine use based on the existing evidence. Noteworthy, saying that a medication should not be routinely recommended does not imply that the same medication may be considered for individual use on case-by-case basis. Flexibility is warranted and should be part of the clinical approach of each single physician: we deal with individuals and all the published data relate to groups of patients; thus, predictions of long-term outcome in a single individual are extremely unreliable.

When translating published recommendations into clinical use, each doctor's ability is challenged to identify exactly the border separating overflexibility from overrigidity. A patient-centered, tailor-made approach is needed and this is even most important in infants and children.

The overall spirit and content of this document should assist clinicians of this geographic region and help them applying in the best possible way the existing evidence regarding management, diagnosis, and prevention of bronchiolitis.



 
   References Top

1.
Mazur NI, Martinón-Torres F, Baraldi E, Fauroux B, Greenough A, Heikkinen T, et al. Lower respiratory tract infection caused by respiratory syncytial virus: Current management and new therapeutics. Lancet Respir Med 2015;3:888-900.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Anderson EJ, Krilov LR, DeVincenzo JP, Checchia PA, Halasa N, Simões EA, et al. SENTINEL1: An observational study of respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations among U.S. Infants born at 29 to 35 weeks' gestational age not receiving immunoprophylaxis. Am J Perinatol 2017;34:51-61.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Baraldi E, Lanari M, Manzoni P, Rossi GA, Vandini S, Rimini A, et al. Inter-society consensus document on treatment and prevention of bronchiolitis in newborns and infants. Ital J Pediatr 2014;40:65.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Justicia-Grande AJ, Pardo-Seco J, Cebey-López M, Vilanova-Trillo L, Gómez-Carballa A, Rivero-Calle I, et al. Development and validation of a new clinical scale for infants with acute respiratory infection: The ReSVinet scale. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157665.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (270 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed202    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded131    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal