Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents   
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 123
Author Reply


Cardiovascular Specialist Centre, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication30-Mar-2018

Correspondence Address:
Abdelfattah A Touman
Cardiovascular Specialist Centre, Dammam
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.228917

PMID: 29675066

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Stratakos GK, Touman AA. Author Reply. Ann Thorac Med 2018;13:123

How to cite this URL:
Stratakos GK, Touman AA. Author Reply. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 May 22];13:123. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2018/13/2/123/228917


We thank the authors of the letter for their interest and the comments on our paper published in a recent issue of Annals of Thoracic Medicine.[1]

Emphasizing the valuable role of the US-guided transthoracic needle aspiration (US-TTNA) for investigating pleural-based nodules is in absolute concordance with the message of our paper. However, from a clinical standpoint, we would like to stress that the key to increase the diagnostic accuracy and decrease the complications rate is the correct patients' selection.

In our paper, the reported pneumothorax rate of 4.4% of the US-TTNA is a pooled analysis from a systematic review which involved 10 relevant studies.[2] The 0.4% complications rate of self-limiting pneumothorax reported using a specific technique that includes a dedicated US probe with a central hole and a semi-automated (20-gauge) modified Menghini type needle is impressive;[3] however, this technique is not universally available nor universally applicable and further research is required to confirm these very promising results.

In conclusion, sampling peripheral lesions are often challenging, and the choice of the best approach should be individualized according to the specific characteristics of the patient and the lesion. Every available modality should be examined in that process to achieve the best possible care for our patients.



 
   References Top

1.
Touman AA, Vitsas VV, Koulouris NG, Stratakos GK. Gaining access to the periphery of the lung: Bronchoscopic and transthoracic approaches. Ann Thorac Med 2017;12:162-70.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
DiBardino DM, Yarmus LB, Semaan RW. Transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:S304-16.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sperandeo M, Dimitri L, Pirri C, Trovato FM, Catalano D, Trovato GM. Advantages of thoracic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in lung cancer and mesothelioma. Chest 2014;146:e178-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (252 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed598    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded85    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal