|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 146-150
|Assessment and comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores in patients with atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia
Abdulrahman M Al-Turaiki1, Maha A Al-Ammari1, Shmeylan A Al-Harbi2, Nabil S Khalidi3, Abdulmalik M Alkatheri2, Tariq M Aldebasi4, Salah M AbuRuz5, Abdulkareem M Albekairy2
1 Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City; Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
4 Division of Ophthalmology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
5 Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
|Date of Submission||22-Dec-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||11-Feb-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||11-Apr-2016|
Abdulrahman M Al-Turaiki
Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh
| Abstract|| |
Aims: No previous reports on the utilization of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in Saudi Arabia have been identified in the literature. The main objectives of this study were to assess and compare the distribution of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores and to identify the most common risk factors for stroke and bleeding among AF patients attending clinical pharmacists managed anticoagulation clinic.
Settings and Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted over 2 months period at clinical pharmacists managed anticoagulation clinic.
Methods: CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores were calculated and compared for all eligible patients.
Results: Two hundred and sixty-four patients with AF were included in the analysis. The number of patients at low risk for stroke was found to be 14 (5.3%) using CHADS2 and only 4 (1.5%) using CHA2DS2-VASc. On the other hand, 64 patients (24.2%) were found at moderate risk for stroke using CHADS2 compared with 17 patients (6.4%) using CHA2DS2-VASc. Most of the patients were found to be at high risk for stroke using either the CHADS2 (70.5%) and CHA2DS2-VASc (92%). The study also revealed that most of the patients were at moderate (63.3%) to high (27.7%) risk of bleeding.
Conclusions: The results of this study show that the percentage of patients at high risk for stroke and bleeding is very high. The study revealed that this could be attributed to the high prevalence of modifiable risk factors for stroke and for bleeding in Saudi patients with AF.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED, Saudi Arabia
|How to cite this article:|
Al-Turaiki AM, Al-Ammari MA, Al-Harbi SA, Khalidi NS, Alkatheri AM, Aldebasi TM, AbuRuz SM, Albekairy AM. Assessment and comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores in patients with atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia. Ann Thorac Med 2016;11:146-50
|How to cite this URL:|
Al-Turaiki AM, Al-Ammari MA, Al-Harbi SA, Khalidi NS, Alkatheri AM, Aldebasi TM, AbuRuz SM, Albekairy AM. Assessment and comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores in patients with atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jan 28];11:146-50. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2016/11/2/146/180026
A trial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmias affecting 0.95% of the population, especially the elderly. One of the major issues in AF patients is the increased risk of stroke, which is five times higher than patients without AF.,
The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score are a validated stroke assessment tools that clinicians use to assess the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF.,,, Although the CHADS2 score has been available for many years and is simple to calculate, it does not include several important risk factors and suffers from important limitations. CHA2DS2-VASc score overcame many of the limitations of the CHADS2 score including its ability to reliably identify “truly low risk” patients, who could be managed with no antithrombotic therapy., Therefore, the CHA2DS2-VASc score is now recommended in recent guidelines instead of the CHADS2 score for stroke assessment in patients with AF.
Clinicians' main concern after starting warfarin or other anticoagulant therapy is the risk of major bleeding. In a large cohort study, in 2013, it was found that the incidence of hospital admission due to hemorrhage was 3.8% per patient per year for a patient receiving warfarin, and 18.1% of those patient die in the hospital or within 7 days after discharge. HAS-BLED is a validated assessment tool that estimates the risk of bleeding.,, Clinicians should consider comparing the risk for major bleeding as calculated by the HAS-BLED score to the risk for thromboembolic events by the CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc to determine if the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the risk.
No previous reports on the utilization and comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores in AF patients in Saudi Arabia have been identified in the literature. Only few studies were published on the clinical characteristics, management, and cardiovascular risk factors in Saudi patients with AF.,
The main objectives of this study were to assess and compare the distribution of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores and to identify the most common risk factors for stroke and bleeding among AF patients attending a clinical pharmacists managed anticoagulation clinic. The incidence of major bleeding episodes among the study sample was also investigated.
| Methods|| |
Subjects and settings
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the anticoagulation clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). KAMC is a 1025 bed Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
At the study site, all patients who are started on warfarin for different indications including AF, either during admission or during ambulatory care, are referred to a clinical pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic for evaluation and monitoring.
The study was conducted on patients attending the clinic between March and April 2014. All patients who were receiving warfarin, diagnosed with valvular or nonvalvular AF, had at least ten international normalized ratio (INR) readings in the hospital information system and were undergoing laboratory testing at KAMC were included. Patients were excluded if they met one of these criteria: Receiving anticoagulants other than warfarin, not followed at KAMC anticoagulation clinic, diagnosed with the end stage liver disease, on chronic hemodialysis, and on warfarin therapy for <4 weeks.
The Institutional Review Board approval from the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center was obtained before launching the study.
A data collection sheet was designed to collect all the demographic and clinical information required for calculation of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores including age, gender, current and previous medical history including hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, liver disease, kidney disease, vascular diseases, bleeding history, and history of stroke. Current medications and pertinent laboratory values were also recorded including INR values, blood pressure, and liver and kidney function tests.
CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores
The CHADS2 score calculation requires adding one point for each of the following risk factors: Congestive heart failure (C), hypertension (H), age ≥75 years (A), and diabetes mellitus (D), and two points for a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (S). CHA2DS2-VASc on the other hand gives an additional point if the patient is >74 years old and one point for each of the following risk factors: Vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and female sex. According to the guidelines of the American Heart Association (AHA) in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) published in 2014 patients are categorized into low (score = 0), intermediate (score = 1), and high-risk (score ≥2) groups for stroke based on their CHA2DS2-VASc. The same categorization also applies to CHADS2 scores.
HAS-BLED score calculation require adding one point for each of the following risk factors: Uncontrolled hypertension (H), abnormal renal or liver function (A), history of stroke (S), history of major bleeding (B), labile INR (L), elderly (age >64 years) (E), use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and antiplatelet or alcohol (D)., The American College of Chest Physicians guidelines (2012) classifies patients based on their HAS-BLED score as having low risk for bleeding (score 0), moderate risk for bleeding (score 1–2), or high risk for bleeding (score ≥3).
Data were coded and entered into SPSS 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Continuous variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables including CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED score distributions were presented as frequencies (%). Chi-square test was used to tests the difference between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc in classifying patients' risk for stroke. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
Clinical characteristics and risk factors for stroke and bleeding
During the study period, 308 patients were screened, 264 patients were eligible to be enrolled in the study, and 44 were excluded (twenty patients were doing laboratory assessment outside of the study hospital, 18 patients had <10 INR readings, one patient was not on warfarin, two patients were on chronic dialysis, and three patients had liver cirrhosis).
Clinical characteristics of the study sample are shown in [Table 1]. The mean ± SD age of the study sample was 68.4 ± 10.8 years; 45.5% of the subjects were male. Hypertension (79.5%), diabetes mellitus (54.5%), female gender (54.5%), and age (38.6%) were the most common risk factors for stroke in the study sample. On the other hand, age (66.7%), labile INR (84.5%), medications (36.7%), and abnormal renal function (18.9%) were the most common risk factors for bleeding.
|Table 1: Clinical characteristics and risk factors for stroke and bleeding|
Click here to view
Distribution and comparison of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores
Distribution of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are shown in [Table 2] and [Figure 1]. The mean CHADS2 score was 2.09 (±1.11), and 186 patients (70.5%) were classified as high risk of stroke. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.55 ± 1.5, and 243 patients (92%) were classified at high risk of stroke. Only four patients (1.5%) were found to be at low risk of stroke with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 compared to 14 (5.3%) patients using the CHADS2 score. The difference between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc in classifying patients for stroke risk was statistically significant.
Distribution of the HAS-BLED scores
Distribution of HAS-BLED scores is shown in [Table 3]. Seventy-three patients (27.7%) were at high risk for bleeding (HAS-BLED score ≥3). The most common risk factors for bleeding in patients at high risk for stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2) [Table 4] were age >64 years (71.6%), followed by labile INR (49%), then medications use (antiplatelet or NSAID) (37.86%).
Occurrence of major bleeding events
Twenty-seven (35.6%) major bleeding events occurred in patients who were identified to be at high risk of bleeding.
| Discussion|| |
This study assessed and compared the distribution of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores among Saudi patient attending a clinical pharmacist's managed anticoagulation clinic. The results of this study show that the percentage of patients at high risk for stroke is very high. The high prevalence of modifiable risk factors for stroke including diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure could explain the prevalence of the high-risk category. These results are in concordance with the results of a recent study on Saudi patients. These findings highlight the urgent needs for health promotion activities in Saudi population that focus on reducing and preventing the modifiable risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular diseases. These health promotion activities should focus on lifestyle modification including physical activities, healthy eating, and weight reduction. In support of this, a large international study highlighted the epidemic of poor physical activities in the Saudi population as compared to other countries.
The prevalence of low-risk category was reduced substantially from 5.3% when using CHADS2 score to 1.5% when using the CHA2-DS2-VASc score in estimating stroke risk. This increased the number of patient eligible for warfarin therapy more than three times. These results confirm the limitations and drawback of relying on CHADS2 score which is highlighted in the recent literature. Therefore, deciding regarding anticoagulant use based on a CHADS2 score as is still recommended in some guidelines may lead to patients being provided suboptimal stroke prophylaxis and being at high risk for stroke. Accordingly, the recent AF guideline published in 2014 by AHA/ACC/HRS recommend using CHA2-DS2-VASc score instead of CHADS2 score that gives a better prediction about patients who are truly at low risk compared with the CHADS2 score.,
In an observational study from 19 countries, 10,614 patients with AF were studied, 38.7% of the population with CHA2DS2-VASc score of zero (low risk) received anticoagulant therapy, and 40.7% with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (high risk) did not receive anticoagulation. In the current study, the number of patients in the low-risk category (CHA2DS2-VASc score = 0) who are prescribed warfarin is low (1.5%). The low incidence of the inappropriate use of anticoagulation therapy at the current study may indicate the importance of clinical pharmacists' managed anticoagulation clinic.
The percentage of patients who were at high risk of bleeding was relatively high in the study sample (27.7%) compared to similar studies such as the report by Marcucci et al. (8.6%). This also could be attributed to the high prevalence of modifiable risk factors in the study sample. On the other hand, a high parentage of patients was using medications that may increase bleeding risk.
| Conclusions|| |
The results of this study show that the percentage of patients at high risk for stroke and bleeding is very high in Saudi patients with AF (92% and 27.7%, respectively). The study revealed that this could be attributed to the high prevalence of modifiable risk factors for stroke and for bleeding. Nationwide campaigns should address this important issue and start implementing serious measures to reduce these risk factors. A specialized anticoagulation clinic is required for close follow-up of these patients to reduce bleeding risk and for continuous monitoring of high-risk patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al.
Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: National implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: The AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285:2370-5.
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983-8.
Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: Results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001;285:2864-70.
Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: The euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 2010;137:263-72.
Olesen JB, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen ML, Lip GY. The value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 score 0-1: A nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2012;107:1172-9.
You JJ, Singer DE, Howard PA, Lane DA, Eckman MH, Fang MC, et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th
ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141 2 Suppl:e531S-75S.
Keogh C, Wallace E, Dillon C, Dimitrov BD, Fahey T. Validation of the CHADS2 clinical prediction rule to predict ischaemic stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2011;106:528-38.
Lane DA, Lip GY. Use of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores to aid decision making for thromboprophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2012;126:860-5.
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr., et al.
2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:e1-76.
Gomes T, Mamdani MM, Holbrook AM, Paterson JM, Hellings C, Juurlink DN. Rates of hemorrhage during warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. CMAJ 2013;185:E121-7.
Roldán V, Marín F, Manzano-Fernández S, Gallego P, Vílchez JA, Valdés M, et al.
The HAS-BLED score has better prediction accuracy for major bleeding than CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2199-204.
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: The Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010;138:1093-100.
Apostolakis S, Lane DA, Buller H, Lip GY. Comparison of the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for the prediction of clinically relevant bleeding in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: The AMADEUS trial. Thromb Haemost 2013;110:1074-9.
Bin Salih SA, Showlag MS, Al-Qahtani MA, Taha A, Yousuf M, Abdullah M. Clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in the central region of Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med 2011;18:80-4.
Hersi A, Abdul-Moneim M, Almous'ad A, Al-Samadi F, AlFagih A, Sweidan R. Saudi Atrial Fibrillation Survey: National, observational, cross-sectional survey evaluating atrial fibrillation management and the cardiovascular risk profile of patients with atrial fibrillation. Angiology 2015;66:244-8.
Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012;380:247-57.
Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP, Fitzmaurice DA, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, et al.
Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: Perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD registry. PLoS One 2013;8:e63479.
Marcucci M, Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Crijns HJ, Iorio A. Stroke and bleeding risk co-distribution in real-world patients with atrial fibrillation: The Euro Heart Survey. Am J Med 2014;127:979-86.e2.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]