Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 238-242
Abrupt withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids does not result in spirometric deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Effect of phenotyping?


1 Medical Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
2 Medical Department, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
3 Pathology Department, Saudi Arabia
4 Family and Community Medicine Department Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission05-Mar-2012
Date of Acceptance19-Apr-2012
Date of Web Publication9-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
Feisal A Al-Kassimi
Department of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box-94357, Riyadh-11693
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.102185

Get Permissions

   Abstract 

Background and Objective: Some studies show a decline of FEV 1 only one month after withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), while others show no decline. We speculate that the presence of an asthma phenotype in the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) population, and that its exclusion may result in no spirometric deterioration.
Methods: We performed a prospective clinical observation study on 32 patients who fulfilled the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive lung disease definition of COPD (Grade II-IV). They were divided into two phenotypic groups. 1. Irreversible asthma (A and B) (n = 13): A. Asthma: Bronchial biopsy shows diffuse thickening of basement membrane (≥ 6.6 ΅m). B. Airflow limitation (AFL) likely to be asthma: KCO > 80% predicted if the patient refused biopsy. 2. COPD (A and B) (n = 19): A. COPD: hypercapneic respiratory failure with raised bicarbonate, panlobular emphysema with multiple bullas, or bronchial biopsy showing squamous metaplasia and epithelial/subepithelial inflammation without thickening of the basement membrane. B. AFL likely to be COPD: KCO < 80% predicted.
Results: The asthma phenotype was significantly younger, had a strong association with hypertrophy of nasal turbinates, and registered a significant improvement of FEV 1 (350 ml) vs a decline of - 26.5 ml in the COPD phenotype following therapy with budesonide/formoterol for one year. Withdrawal of budesonide for 4 weeks in the COPD phenotype resulted in FEV 1 + 1.33% (SD ΁ 5.71) and FVC + 1.24% (SD ΁ 5.32); a change of <12% in all patients.
Conclusions: We recorded no spirometric deterioration after exclusion of the asthma phenotype from a COPD group.


Keywords: Asthma, COPD, radiology and other imaging, respiratory function tests


How to cite this article:
Al-Kassimi FA, Alhamad EH, Al-Hajjaj MS, Abba AA, Raddaoui E, Shaikh SA. Abrupt withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids does not result in spirometric deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Effect of phenotyping?. Ann Thorac Med 2012;7:238-42

How to cite this URL:
Al-Kassimi FA, Alhamad EH, Al-Hajjaj MS, Abba AA, Raddaoui E, Shaikh SA. Abrupt withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids does not result in spirometric deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Effect of phenotyping?. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2014 Sep 22];7:238-42. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2012/7/4/238/102185


The role of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management is still controversial. Although ICS are universally accepted to reduce COPD exacerbations by about 25%, their efficacy in other areas is widely debated. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] The balance seem to be tipping in their favor; many studies show a significant rise of FEV 1 with ICS, compared with placebo. [8],[9],[10],[11] On the other hand, a decline in FEV 1 with ICS withdrawal (after only one month) has also been reported. [12] This has deterred many of our colleagues from withdrawing ICS, even in patients who do not qualify for such treatment according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria (frequent exacerbations and FEV 1 < 50% predicted). [13] Studies on the effects of withdrawing ICS on spirometric deterioration yield conflicting results. [12],[14],[15],[16]

We hypothesize that ICS withdrawal would not produce significant spirometric deterioration provided that by careful selection, patients with irreversible asthma are removed from the "COPD" group. Studies show that 20-48% of "COPD" patients have features characteristic of irreversible asthma. [17],[18],[19] Smoking is an important risk factor for both irreversible asthma and COPD. [20] Moreover, the two conditions have been known to be concomitantly, or alternately, ascribed to the same patient. [21] Phenotyping is documented to predict the response to corticosteroids in COPD. [17],[19],[22],[23],[24] Several authors have recommended targeting treatment to the COPD phenotype. [25],[26]

In our practice, ICS are routinely withdrawn in the COPD phenotype in the spring and summer months when the risk of exacerbations is at its lowest. We decided to study the effect of the withdrawal on spirometry.


   Methods Top


Patient selection and diagnostic criteria

This is a prospective clinical observation study conducted between April and May 2009 at King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and approved by the King Saud University's Internal Review Board for ethics approval. All patients attending the Respiratory Medicine clinics in the six months prior to the study were screened. Subjects were smokers (≥ 10 pack/year) with airflow limitation (AFL) (FEV 1 < 80% predicted, FEV 1 /FVC < 70%) that was persistent despite budesonide/formoterol treatment (320 μcg budesonide/9 μcg formoterol bid for at least 3 weeks). Patients in this group who fulfilled the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive lung disease diagnostic criteria for COPD were labeled as undiagnosed AFL, and further subdivided into irreversible asthma or COPD phenotypes. Irreversible asthma was diagnosed if the bronchial biopsy showed uniform thickening of the basement membrane of 6.6 μm or more. [27] The diagnosis was registered as AFL likely to be irreversible asthma, in any patient who refused biopsy and had normal diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide coefficient (KCO3 80 % predicted).

COPD was diagnosed in the presence of any of the following: 1) Chronic hypercapneic respiratory failure at least one month outside exacerbations; defined as PaO 2 ≤ 60 mm Hg, PaCO 2 > 45 mm Hg, and serum bicarbonate > 28 m mol/l; 2) Panlobular emphysema with bullas larger than 2 cm observed with high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT). Panlobular emphysema was defined as areas of low attenuation without a well-defined wall and associated with vascular and septal disruption; 3) Squamous metaplasia with epithelial/subepithelial inflammation and a reticular basement membrane of 6.0 μm or less, observed with bronchial biopsy. [27] AFL likely to be COPD was diagnosed if the KCO was less than 80% predicted. The rationale for this classification is described in more detail in the discussion, and elsewhere. [19]

It was routine practice to use HRCT, arterial blood gases, fiberoptic biopsy of the 3 rd order bronchus, and diffusion studies, as part of the diagnostic work-up of AFL in smokers of more than 10 pack/year and who fulfilled the GOLD definition of COPD. [19] We had four diagnostic slots: irreversible asthma or AFL likely to be asthma (grouped as the irreversible asthma phenotype), and COPD or AFL likely to be COPD (grouped as the COPD phenotype). ICS are routinely withdrawn in the COPD phenotype in the spring and summer months (April-September) when the risk of exacerbations is at its lowest. The data from this study was published as an abstract in the Gulf Thoracic 2011, the annual meeting of the Saudi Thoracic Society. [28]

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistical Software Package (SPSS pc + version 13.0; SPSS Inc, USA). The Mann-Whitney U-Test was used to compare the median values of skewed continuous variables. The Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used to observe an association between categorical study and outcome variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


There were a total of 32 patients with undiagnosed AFL. Of these, 13 were of the irreversible asthma phenotype: eight with asthma and five with AFL likely to be asthma. The remaining 19 were of the COPD phenotype based on the following: six had panlobular emphysema with bullas, four patients had hypercapneic respiratory failure, one patient had both, and a positive bronchial biopsy in five. Three patients had AFL likely to be COPD. All were male patients. [Table 1] gives the characteristics of both phenotypes and shows significant differences. Patients in the irreversible asthma phenotype were younger, had earlier onset of wheeze and dyspnea (45 vs 59 years), and were more likely to suffer from allergic rhinitis and hypertrophy of nasal turbinates. They also achieved a mean rise of FEV1 of 350 ml with budesonide/formoterol, vs a decline of -26.5 ml in the COPD phenotype.

Four weeks after budesonide withdrawal in the COPD phenotype group, changes in FEV1 and FVC were 1.33% (±5.71) and 1.24% (±5.32), respectively. The change was <12% and 200 ml in all patients [Figure 1].
Table 1: Characteristics of irreversible asthma and COPD phenotypes

Click here to view
Figure 1: Change of FEV1 and FVC after withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


We showed no spirometric deterioration following budesonide withdrawal in a small group of COPD patients where the asthma phenotype was excluded (based on bronchial histology and normal coefficient of carbon monoxide diffusion, KCO). We also show that phenotyping based on CT scanning and bronchial biopsy can be applied in routine clinical practice to predict responses to withdrawal of ICS. Phenotyping has been described as the "future of COPD." [29] There is mounting evidence that COPD phenotypes differ in their physiology and response to B 2 -agonists and corticosteroids. Using HRCT scanning, Fujimoto et al. classified COPD into the following three phenotypes: 1) absent emphysema regardless of bronchial wall thickening (phenotype A), 2) emphysema with bronchial wall thickening (phenotype M), and 3) predominantly emphysema (phenotype E). [30] Phenotype A is associated with normal diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL CO ) and is significantly reversible with β2 agonists. Phenotype M is also reversible but has low DL CO . [30] Phenotype E has a low DL CO and no significant reversibility. [30] Fujimoto et al. speculated that some patients in phenotype A are asthmatic. [30] Chanez et al. showed that 12 of 25 "COPD" patients had significant reversibility with oral prednisolone and bronchial biopsy revealed uniform thickening of the basement membrane in those 12 patients, compatible with irreversible asthma. [17] In 2010, Lee et al. measured the CT emphysema score in the lung (areas of attenuation below -950 Hounsfield units at full inspiration) and found a correlation with low DLCO and lack of bronchodilator response, or improvement of dyspnea score following three months of combined LABA/ICS therapy. [24] Other studies report improved FEV 1 and shuttle distance in response to ICS or prednisolone only in COPD patients with a high sputum eosinophil count. [22],[23] Barnes and others speculate that eosinophilic cases represent an asthmatic component of the COPD syndrome, or concomitant asthma and COPD. [7] If phenotyping with HRCT, bronchial biopsy, or sputum cytology had not been applied in these studies, the patients would have been labeled as "COPD" and prednisolone and ICS would have shown a bronchodilator effect. A recently released Consensus Document in Spain recommends major and minor criteria for diagnosing the asthma phenotype in the COPD population. [31]

We found that a physiological and anatomical phenotyping based on arterial blood gases, HRCT, and bronchial biopsy in addition to KCO is a simple and reliable means of differentiating asthma and COPD and predicting the response to ICS and yearly decline of FEV 1 . [19] We currently use this phenotyping approach in smokers who remain obstructive despite treatment with formoterol (9 μcg) and budesonide (360 μg bid), administered for at least three weeks. In this study, COPD was diagnosed by the presence of chronic hypercapneic respiratory failure, panlobular emphysema with bullas, or bronchial biopsy showing COPD changes (as described in the methods section). Large studies on patients receiving long-term oxygen for chronic respiratory failure included no asthmatics. [32],[33] We found no reports of chronic hypercapnia with raised bicarbonate in stable asthma outside exacerbations. We found a report where some elderly subjects with irreversible asthma (average FEV 1 55 ± 0.5% predicted) required home oxygen therapy. [34] Even in that extreme group with marked obstruction, the alveolar-arterial gradient for oxygen was only 22.1 ± 1.6 mm Hg, and PaO 2 was 76.9 ± 1.7 mm Hg. It is not mentioned whether home oxygen was used intermittently or asthma exacerbations or continuously. [34] Although mild centrilobular and paraseptal emphysematous changes are occasionally seen in asthma, panlobular emphysema has never been described. [35] Irreversible asthma is diagnosed exclusively by bronchial biopsy where diffuse thickening of the basement membrane to 6.6 μm or more is observed. Early studies stated that thickening of the basement membrane could not differentiate asthma and COPD, [36],[37] but these studies were conducted on patients with reversible asthma and normal FEV 1 . [37] In Fabbri's landmark study on the histological differentiation of asthma and COPD, they used patients with FEV 1 of about 60% predicted in both groups and showed no overlap in the thickness of the basement membrane between the groups (6.6-9.7 μm vs 4.2-6.2 μm). [27] In Fabbri's study, and others, the thickness of the basement membrane was a predictor of response to oral prednisolone and ICS. [17],[19],[27] In addition, the thickness of the basement membrane (and other histological features) was strongly associated with atopic features such as a history of allergic rhinitis and hypertrophy of nasal turbinates. [19] Patients with a KCO <80% predicted and who refused bronchial biopsy were given the diagnostic label of undiagnosed AFL likely to be COPD. Normal or high diffusion capacity is consistently observed in asthma, even when it is severe or irreversible, unless there is concomitant bronchiectasis where DLCO may be reduced. [38],[39] In Fabbri's study, the mean carbon monoxide diffusion capacity was 65.4 and 85% predicted in irreversible asthma and COPD, respectively, and the mean KCO was 60% and 82.9%, respectively. [27] Al-Kassimi et al. recently reported total concurrence between bronchial histology and KCO in both irreversible asthma and COPD. [19] Earlier studies produced conflicting results on the sensitivity and specificity of diffusion capacity for distinguishing asthma and COPD but no phenotyping was done. In Fujimoto's stratification by CT scan, the DLCO of E and M phenotypes were 49.3 ± 2.1 and 61.6 ± 2.8% of predicted, respectively. [30]

The 19 patients in this study, who were strictly selected from a total of 32 "COPD" patients where irreversible asthma phenotypes were excluded, displayed no decline of FEV 1 or FVC, four weeks after withdrawal of ICS. Previous studies on the effect of withdrawal of ICS on FEV 1 yielded conflicting results. In a small crossover study on 24 patients (only 15 completed the study), FEV 1 declined significantly on withdrawal of beclomethasone, but the six-minute walk test was unchanged. [16] Their results support the possibility that asthmatic patients were inadvertently included: some patients had normal diffusion capacity, and the decline of FEV 1 occurred in some but not all patients. [16] Another study reported a significant decline of FEV 1 one month after withdrawal of fluticasone. [12] However, the decline of FEV 1 was modest at 4.1% (95% CI, 1.6-6.6) even at twelve months. [12] The study also used 10% reversibility upon salbutamol inhalation as a criterion for excluding asthma and single reversibility tests have been shown to be unable to distinguish irreversible asthma and COPD. [40] On the other hand, the COPE study failed to detect any significant decline of FEV 1 , 6-minute walk test, or Borg Scale of breathlessness following withdrawal of ICS. [15] Similarly, a study conducted in primary care in the U.K. found no significant deterioration of FEV 1 or the St. George's respiratory questionnaire. [14]

The claims that ICS, either after induction or withdrawal, have a large effect on FEV 1 raise the following objections:

  1. In COPD, there is reduced activity of histone deacetylation, which is the main mechanism of suppression of inflammatory genes by corticosteroids. [41],[42] This persists even after cessation of smoking. [41] ICS were found to have no effect on inflammatory cells or markers in patients with COPD, or in vitro at a cellular level. [43],[44],[45],[46],[47]
  2. Some of the large trials of ICS in COPD used two sets of patients: 1) a "reversible," group who improved their average FEV 1 by 29% post 400 mcg salbutamol, and 2) an "irreversible" group, with only 8% salbutamol reversibility. [10] El-Kassimi suggested in 2004 that these studies on "COPD" had inadvertently included patients with asthma, which explained the bronchodilator effect of ICS. [48] The suggestion was based, not only on the above figures of salbutamol reversibility, but also on the fact that patients with a previous history of asthma were included. [10]


Our study has the limitation of a small number of patients. This is related to the fact that the large-scale epidemic of smoking is a recent phenomenon in Saudi Arabia. A further limitation is the short duration of ICS withdrawal. This limitation may be mitigated, however, by the fact that previous studies reported spirometric deterioration only one month after ICS withdrawal. [12] Lastly, this was not a drug trial where we could also have withdrawn budesonide in the irreversible asthma phenotype patients. As seen from [Table 1], the irreversible asthma phenotype achieved a 350 ml rise of FEV 1 after one year of budesonide/formoterol therapy and probably would have experienced significant deterioration upon ICS withdrawal. The previous studies on ICS withdrawal did not also use an asthmatic control group. The Spanish Consensus Document advises caution with abrupt withdrawal of ICS in the asthma phenotype. [31]

In conclusion, in a small population of COPD sufferers, where the irreversible asthma phenotype (+ve bronchial biopsy or normal KCO) was excluded, there was no significant drop of FEV 1 or FVC four weeks after withdrawal of budesonide.


   Acknowledgments Top


The College of Medicine Research Center of King Saud University has offered technical support for the research.

 
   References Top

1.Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, Ferguson GT, Jenkins C, Jones PW, et al. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:775-89.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Calverley P, Pauwels R, Vestbo J, Jones P, Pride N, Gulsvik A, et al. Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:449-56.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Burge PS, Calverley PM, Jones PW, Spencer S, Anderson JA, Maslen TK. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The ISOLDE trial. BMJ 2000;320:1297-303.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Kardos P, Wencker M, Glaab T, Vogelmeier C. Impact of salmeterol/fluticasone proprionate versus salmeterol on exacerbations in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:144-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Glaab T, Taube C. Effect of inhaled corticosteroids in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2011;24:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Rodrigo GJ, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Plaza V. Safety and efficacy of combined long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids vs long-acting beta-agonists monotherapy for stable COPD: A systematic review. Chest 2009;136:1029-38.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Barnes PJ. Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: A controversy. Respiration 2010;80:89-95.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Tashkin DP, Rennard SI, Martin P, Ramachandran S, Martin UJ, Silkoff PE, et al. Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Results of a 6-month randomized clinical trial. Drugs 2008;68:1975-2000.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Mahler DA, Wire P, Horstman D, Chang CN, Yates J, Fischer T. Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combination delivered via the Diskus devise in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 166:1084-91.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Hanania NA, Darken P, Horstman D, Reisner C, Lee B, Davis S, et al. The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (250 µg)/salmeterol (50 µg) combined in the Diskus Inhaler for the treatment of COPD. Chest 2003;124:834-43.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Calverley PM, Kuna P, Monsó E, Costantini M, Petruzzelli S, Sergio F. Beclomethasone/formoterol in the management of COPD: A randomized controlled trial. Respir Med 2010;104:1858-68.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Wouters EFM, Postma DS, Fokkenst B, Hop WC, Prins J, Kuipers AF, et al. For the COSMIC group. Withdrawal of fluticasone propionate from combined salmeterol/fluticasone treatment in patients with COPD causes immediate and sustained disease deterioration: A randomized controlled trial. Thorax 2005;60:480-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Global Initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Updated 2010. Accessed at www.goldcopd.org on 28 th June 2011.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Choudhury AB, Dawson CM, Kilvington HE, Eldridge S, James WY, Wedzicha JA. Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in people with COPD in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Respir Res 2007;8:93.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.van der Valk P, Monninkhof E, van der Palen J, Zielhuis G, van Herwaarden C. Effect of discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The COPE study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1358-63.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.O'Brien A, Russo-Magno P, Karki A, Hiranniramol S, Hardin M, Kaszuba M, et al. Effects of withdrawal of inhaled steroids in men with severe irreversible airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:365-71.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Chanez P, Vignola AM, O'Shaugnessy T, Enander I, Li D, Jeffery PK, et al. Corticosteroid reversibility in COPD is related to features of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1529-34.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Bellia V, Battaglia S, Catalano F, Scichilone N, Incalzi RA, Imperiale C, et al. Aging and disability affect misdiagnosis of COPD in elderly asthmatics: The SARA study. Chest 2003;123:1066-72.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Al-Kassimi FA, Abba AA, Al-Hajjaj MS, Alhamad EH, Raddaoui E, Shaikh SH. Asthma Masquerading as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Study of Smokers Fulfilling the GOLD definition of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Respiration 2011;82:19-27.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Ten Brinke A. Risk factors associated with irreversible airflow limitation in asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;8:63-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Shaya FT, Dongyi D, Okazawa M, Blanchette CM, Wang J, Mapel DW, et al. Burden of concomitant asthma and COPD in Medicaid population. Chest 2008;134:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Birring S, Green R, Siva R, et al. Sputum eosinophilia and the short term response to inhaled mometasone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2005;60:193-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Brightling CE, Monteiro W, Ward R, Parker D, Morgan MD, Wardlow AJ, et al. Sputum eosinophila and short-term response to prednisolone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;356:1480-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Lee JH, Lee YK, Kim EK, Kim TH, Huh JW, Kim WJ, et al. Responses to inhaled long-acting beta-agonist and corticosteroid according to COPD subtype. Respir Med 2010;104:542-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Fingleton J, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Towards individualized treatment in COPD. Thorax 2011;66:363-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Shirtcliffe P, Weatherall M, Travers J, Beasley R. The multiple dimensions of airways disease: Targeting treatment to clinical phenotypes. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2011;17:72-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Fabbri LM, Romagnoli M, Corbetta, Casoni G, Busljetic K, Turato G, et al. Differences in airway inflammation in patients with fixed airflow obstruction due to asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:418-24.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Al-Kassimi FA, Al-Hajjaj MS, Alhamad EH, Abba AA, Raddaoui E, Shaikh SA. Abrupt withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD does not produce spirometric deterioration: Role of phenotyping. Ann Thorac Med 2011;6:174.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: The future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:598-604.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Fujimoto K, Kitaguchi Y, Kubo K, Honda T. Clinical analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes classified using high-resolution computed tomography. Respirology 2006;11:731-40.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Soler-Catluña JJ, Cosio B, Izquierdo JL, López-Campos JL, Marin JM, Agüero R, et al. Consensus Document on the mixed asthma-COPD phenotype in COPD. Arch Bronconeumol 2012. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Caramori G, Fabbri M, Paioli D, Falcone F, Severino C, Felisatti G, et al. Asthma is not a common cause of severe chronic respiratory failure in non-smokers: ALOT study. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2005;63:84-7.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Szafranski W, Polsce JZ. Long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy (LTOT) in Poland in the years 1986-2005 (in Polish). Pneumonol Alergol Pol 2007;75:331-42.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Tsuda Y, Nogochi T, Mochizuki H, Makino F, Nanjo Y, Sawabe M. et al. Patients with mild-to-moderate asthma may develop clinically significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology 2009;14:529-36.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Harmanci E, Kebapci M, Metintas M, Ozkan R. High-resolution computed tomography findings are correlated with disease severity in asthma. Respiration 2002;69:420-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Bourdin A, Serre I, Flamme A, Vic P, Neveu D, Aubas B, et al. Can endobronchial biopsy analysis be recommended to discriminate between asthma and COPD in routine practice? Thorax 2004;59:488-93.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Liesker JJ, Ten Hacken NH, Zeinstra-Smith M, Rutgers SR, Postma DS, Timens W. Reticular basement membrane in asthma and COPD: Similar thickness, yet different composition. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2009;4:127-35.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Mitsunobu F, Mifune T, Ashida K, Hosaki Y, Tsugeno H, Okamoto M, et al. Influence of age and disease severity on high resolution CT lung densitometry in asthma. Thorax 2001;56:851-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Boulet LP, Turcotte H, Hudon C, Carrier G, Maltais F. Clinical, physiological and radiological features of asthma with incomplete reversibility compared with those of COPD. Can Respir J 1998;5:270-7.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Chhabra SK. Acute bronchodilator response has limited value in differentiating bronchial asthma from COPD. J Asthma 2005;42:367-72.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Barnes PJ. How corticosteroids control inflammation: Quintiles Prize Lecture 2005. Br J Pharmacol 2006;148:245-54.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Barnes PJ, Ito K, Adcock IM. Corticosteroid resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Inactivation of histone deacetylase. Lancet 2004;363:731-3.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Keatings VM, Jatakanon A, Worsdell YM, Barnes PJ. Effects of inhaled and oral glucocorticoids on inflammatory indices in asthma and COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:542-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Culpitt SV, Maziak W, Loukidis S, Nightingale JA, Matthews JL, Barnes PJ. Effect of high dose inhaled steroid on cells, cytokines, and proteases in induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1635-9.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Loppow D, Schleiss MB, Kanniess F, Taube C, Jörres RA, Magnussen H. In patients with chronic bronchitis a four week trial with inhaled steroids does not attenuate airway inflammation. Respir Med 2001;95:115-21.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.Gizycki MJ, Hattotuwa KL, Barnes N, Jeffery PK. Effects of fluticasone propionate on inflammatory cells in COPD: An ultrastructural examination of endobronchial biopsy tissue. Thorax 2002;57:799-803.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Saha S, Brightling CE. Eosinophilic airway inflammation in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2006;1:39-47.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.El-Kassimi FA. Differentiating asthma and COPD patients (Letter to the editor). Chest 2004;126:653-4; author reply 654-5.  Back to cited text no. 48
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Re: Phenotyping of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: heterogeneity and its clinical relevance
Feisal A. Al-Kassimi,Esam H. Alhamad
Current Respiratory Care Reports. 2013; 2(3): 194
[Pubmed]
2 A challenge to the seven widely believed concepts of COPD
Al-Kassimi, F.A. and Alhamad, E.H.
International Journal of COPD. 2013; 8: 21-30
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (454 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1884    
    Printed89    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded421    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal