Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents   
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 154
Agreement and differences between venous and arterial gas analysis


Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication29-Jun-2011

Correspondence Address:
Sunil K Chhabra
Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.82454

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Chhabra SK. Agreement and differences between venous and arterial gas analysis. Ann Thorac Med 2011;6:154

How to cite this URL:
Chhabra SK. Agreement and differences between venous and arterial gas analysis. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 13];6:154. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2011/6/3/154/82454


Sir,

Koul et al. [1] have compared arterial blood gas (ABG) and venous blood gas (VBG) analysis to determine whether the latter can be used as an alternative to the former because of easier access, less pain and fewer complications associated with it. The objectives are clinically very relevant. However, the study could have been designed and analyzed differently to obtain greater information.

The agreement between ABG and VBG analysis was very strong for pH and PCO 2 and but much less for PO 2 . From this, Koul et al. [1] conclude that it is not clinically acceptable enough to support uniform usage of venous PO 2 instead of the arterial measurements in clinical situations. These results are entirely predictable on a physiological basis. Venous blood gas values depend on the arterial PO 2 , arterial-tissue exchanges, cardiac output and local blood flow. Normally, venous-arterial PCO 2 , pH and HCO 3 differ only in a narrow range because of effective buffering and regulatory mechanisms, whereas PO 2 differs greatly because the normal levels in tissues are 40 mmHg while arterial level is close to 100 mmHg. From the data presented, it is apparent that there were a substantial proportion of subjects with a normal ABG in this study and hence the results are as expected.

Analysing patients with normal and abnormal ABGs separately would have provided more useful information. The VBG in the latter are likely to be unpredictable as the underlying cause, compensations and complications such as a hemodynamic compromise would alter the normal arterial-venous relationship. The normally linear relationship for pH, PCO 2 and HCO 3 is known to be lost in critically ill patients. [2] Regression of venous values over arterial would have brought out the strength of the relationship and answered the question of utility or otherwise of VBG in such patients.

Nevertheless, VBG has its uses. Normal venous pH, PCO 2 and HCO 3 rule out severe acid-base disturbances. [2] As reviewed by the authors, in several conditions of metabolic acidosis as well as in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ABG and VBG provide similar or predictable results for pH, PCO 2 and HCO 3 . A venous PCO 2 value above 45 mmHg detects all cases of significant arterial hypercapnia. [3]

VBG analysis therefore has limitations in the assessment of oxygen delivery in respiratory failure while in primarily metabolic disturbances, it can be as useful as an ABG sans all the disadvantages of the latter. The suggestion of the authors is that VBG may be used for pH and PCO 2 and combined with spO 2 is worthwhile and needs to be studied for its utility in replacing ABG in serial measurements to monitor patients especially when long-term intensive management is required or sampling is required several times daily. An spO 2 above 95% makes respiratory failure extremely unlikely and hence an ABG can be avoided.

There appears to be an oversight or a typing error. The SD of arterial pH is given as 0.56 that appears to be too high considering the range of values and the 95% CI.

 
   References Top

1.Koul PA, Khan UH, Wani AA, Eachkoti R, Jan RA, Shah S, et al. Comparison and agreement between venous and arterial gas analysis in cardiopulmonary patients in Kashmir valley of the Indian subcontinent. Ann Thorac Med 2011;6:33-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Gennis PR, Skovron ML, Aronson ST, Gallagher EJ. The usefulness of peripheral venous blood in estimating acid-base status in acutely ill patients. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:845-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Kelly AM, Kyle E, McAlpine R. Venous pCO 2 and pH can be used to screen for significant hypercarbia in emergency patients with acute respiratory disease. J Emerg Med 2002;22:15-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (211 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3459    
    Printed99    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded461    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal