Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents   
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 102-103
The perils of laboratory research


1 Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Medical Biochemistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication28-Mar-2011

Correspondence Address:
Feisal A Al-Kassimi
Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.78435

PMID: 21572703

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Al-Kassimi FA, Chishi MA. The perils of laboratory research. Ann Thorac Med 2011;6:102-3

How to cite this URL:
Al-Kassimi FA, Chishi MA. The perils of laboratory research. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Jan 28];6:102-3. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2011/6/2/102/78435


Sir,

We read with great excitement your September 2010 publication titled "Reactive oxygen metabolites can be used to differentiate malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions". [1] Cobanoglu et al. reported that the level of reactive oxygen molecules (ROMs) are hugely raised in malignant effusions as opposed to no or modest rise in nonmalignant effusions (parapneumonic, tuberculous, and empyema). ROM in serum and pleura fluid differentiated the two categories with a 100% sensitivity and specificity (high in malignant and low in inflammatory effusions). We would like to raise the following concerns:

  1. At the time the various criteria (using multiple chemical markers) did not achieve 100% accuracy in distinguishing transudative and exudative effusions, here we have a single test that 100% sensitive and specific in differentiating the etiology of exudates.
  2. The Introduction and Discussion sections downplay the importance of ROM in inflammatory conditions and highlight their association with malignancy. As a matter of fact, ROM (including hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion, and hydroxyl radicals) and also called free oxygen radicals are abundantly produced by polymorphs and other phagocytes to enhance their bactericidal action. Moreover, death in pneumonia was attributed to imbalance (excess) of ROM and lung injury. [2] Significant rises were documented in community-acquired pneumonia in both lung tissue and plasma. [3] Synovial fluid showed enhancement of free radicals in knee arthritis. [4] Serum markers of free radicals were elevated in all 17 patients with tuberculous pleurisy. [5] In the publication in question although the average level of ROM in the serum and pleural fluid of pyogenic and tuberculous pleurisy was significantly higher than controls, 19/30 of serum samples had normal or low levels, and 17/30 of pleural fluid samples had normal or low levels as judged by the reference level in healthy Italians supplied by the manufacturer of the ROM kit used in the study (Diacron, Grosseto, Italy). Do the authors have an explanation for such low levels in inflammatory effusions?
  3. We agree with the authors that ROM levels are generally raised in malignant pleural effusions. Studies showed that the elevated levels of ROM differentiated exudative and transudative effusions with excellent sensitivity and specificity. They also contradict the authors' findings that the ROM level distinguishes malignant and inflammatory effusions. In the best of these studies, published in Chest in 2006, the mean and distribution of ROM were the same in malignant and inflammatory effusions. [6] However, the authors of your publication list the above-mentioned study in a different context. Shouldn't the authors have commented that their findings are different from other published data especially those in Chest. Nitrous oxide (NO) is not a ROM but is closely related and enhances their action. NO levels in pleural fluid also failed to differentiate inflammatory and malignant effusions as it was raised in both. [7]
  4. The method used by the authors to estimate ROM may throw a light on the discrepancy of results. ROMs are unstable products at room temperature and immediate freezing is mandatory. The storage temperature varies according to the duration of storage. Immediate chilling at -4ºC is needed for a few hours storage, but much colder snap freezing is required for long storage. In the publication in your journal we read "pleural fluid, blood samples were kept at room temperature for 30-60 minutes and centrifuged for 10-15 min. Thereafter, fluids were separated from the shaped elements using an automatic pipette. The sera and pleural fluid were kept in the deep freezer at -35ºC…." Deep freezers take some time to freeze samples. The considerable delay may explain why inflammatory samples, which are highly cellular and may contain bacteria, had low levels of ROM. The degradation of ROM (especially hydrogen peroxide) is enhanced by contact with high levels of organic matter. These methods compare very unfavorably with other studies where pleural fluid samples were analyzed immediately or lung samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80ºC. [2],[6]


 
   References Top

1.Cobanoglu U, Sayir F, Mergan D. Reactive oxygen metabolites can be used to differentiate malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions. Ann Thorac Med 2010;5:140-4.   Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Marriott HM, Jackson LE, Wilkinson TS, Simpson AJ, Mitchell TJ, Buttle DK, et al. Reactive oxygen species regulate neutrophil recruitment and survival in pneumococcal pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:887-95.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Stepovaia EA, Petina GV, Zhavoronok TV, Riazantseva NV, Ivanov VV, Ageeva TS, et al. The functional properties and oxidative modification of plasma and correct neutrophil proteins in community-acquired pneumonia. Klin Lab Diagn March 2010;18-21.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Wagner C, Iking-Konert C, Hug F, Stegmaier, Heppert V, Wentzensen, et al Cellular inflammatory response to persistent localized Staphylococcus aureus infection: Phenotypical and functional characterization of poly morphonuclear neutrophils (PMN). Clin Exp Immunol 2006;143:70-7.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Jack CI, Jackson MJ, Hind CR. Circulating markers of free radical activity in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis 1994;75:132-7.   Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Papageorgiou E, Kostikas K, Kiropoulous T, Karetsi E, Mpatavanis G, Gourgoulianis KI. Increased oxidative stress in exudative pleural effusions: A new marker for the differentiation between exudates and transudates? Chest 2005;128:3291-7.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Hamed EA, El-Noweihi AM, Mohamed AZ, Mahmoud A. Vasoactive mediators (VEGF and TNF-alpha) in patients with malignant and tuberculous pleural effusions. Respirology 2004;9:81-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (243 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1634    
    Printed121    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded294    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal