Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
 
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 44-47
Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test


1 Department of Critical Care, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon

Date of Submission18-Sep-2007
Date of Acceptance28-Feb-2008

Correspondence Address:
H Lababidi
Department of Critical Care, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.39635

PMID: 19561904

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

Purpose: Asthma control test (ACT) has been devised to assess the degree of asthma control in out-patients setting. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT.
Materials and Methods: Patients completed the Arabic version of ACT during regular visit to one of two asthma specialists. Spirometry was obtained. The asthma specialist rated asthma control using a 5-point scale and indicated modification in management as step up, same or step down of asthma treatment.
Results: 40 patients completed the study, the mean age was 32.6 + 14.0 years, mean FEV1 was 2.7 + 1.0 L (89.2% + 23.6% of predicted). The mean ACT score was 15.9 + 5.8; mean of specialist asthma control rating was 3.4 + 1.0. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT survey was alpha = 0.92. The correlation was moderate between ACT and specialists rating ( r = 0.482, P = 0.002) and between ACT and treatment modification ( r = -0.350, P = 0.027). The correlation between FEV1 and ACT was low ( r = 0.185, P = 0.259). ACT distinguished between patients with different specialist rating ( F = 3.37, P = 0.02) and the need to change therapy ( F = 3.62, P = 0.037). The areas under the curve (ROC) for ACT, FEV1, and ACT and FEV1 as independent variables were 0.720, 0.721, and 0.766 respectively. All results were comparable to the initial work for development of ACT.
Conclusion: The Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool to assess asthma control. ACT correlates better with asthma specialist rating of asthma control than with FEV1.


Keywords: Asthma, asthma assessment, asthma control test


How to cite this article:
Lababidi H, Hijaoui A, Zarzour M. Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test. Ann Thorac Med 2008;3:44-7

How to cite this URL:
Lababidi H, Hijaoui A, Zarzour M. Validation of the Arabic version of the asthma control test. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Jan 19];3:44-7. Available from: http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/text.asp?2008/3/2/44/39635


Asthma is a clinical diagnosis made by physicians on the basis of patient's medical history, physical examination, assessment of the reversibility of airway obstruction, and exclusion of alternative diagnosis that mimic asthma. [1] Asthma is a very common disease with immense social impact. The global prevalence of asthma ranges from 1% to 18%. [2] The improved understanding of the pathophysiology underlying asthma and the emergence of medications to prevent acute exacerbations more effectively have led clinicians to shift their focus from managing acute attack to achieving asthma control. [3] According to international guidelines, the primary goal of asthma management is to achieve and maintain asthma control defined as 'no daytime symptoms, no limitations of daily activities, no nocturnal symptoms or awakening, no need for reliever treatment, normal or near-normal lung function results and no exacerbations.' [4] Based on results of large multinational, community-based surveys of asthma showing that the majority of patients have an alarmingly high rate of symptoms and disruption of life from their disease, [5] one can say that this goal has not been achieved.

Asthma control can be difficult to assess in clinical practice because of its multidimensional nature and variability over time. Tools that are easily and quickly administered in clinical practice are required in order to develop an accurate, quick, and practical asthma control test. Thus, the need for a simple method for quantifying asthma control by both patients and physicians has brought up the development of a short assessment tool called the asthma control test (ACT). This tool is a five-item questionnaire developed as an easy method for patients and clinicians to assess symptoms, use of rescue medications, and impact on activities. [3] Each question is graded from one to five. The score range is 5 to 25. Well-controlled asthma is defined as a score above 20 on ACT. Asthma control test has been translated into different languages. The Arabic version has been professionally translated and distributed by the pharmaceutical company Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK). [6]

To the best of our knowledge, the Arabic version of ACT has not been clinically validated yet. We elected to replicate the original study of the ACT by Nathan et al. , [3] but with the Arabic version. Similar results will indicate validation of the Arabic version of the ACT. The aim of this study is to validate the Arabic version of ACT with regard to FEV 1 and asthma control as assessed by asthma specialists.


   Materials and Methods Top


This is a prospective study performed over a 3-month period, from November 2006 to January 2007. Patients older than 10 years who had been diagnosed with asthma and who were literate in Arabic were eligible for participation unless they had other respiratory conditions or were participating in other clinical studies. Patients were recruited from two asthma specialists' practices. Institutional Review Board at Makassed General Hospital approved the study, and all patients or guardians signed a written informed consent. Oral approval to use the Arabic version of ACT was obtained from GSK, Lebanon.

Participants completed the ACT during a routine physician office visit before they were seen by their physician. After the patient completed the survey, pre-bronchodilator measurements of FEV 1 were obtained. The physician, who was blinded to each subject's survey responses, interviewed the patient. During the interview, the level of asthma control for each subject was rated by the asthma specialist on a five-point scale ranging from 'not controlled at all' to 'completely controlled.' This rating of asthma control was based on how well the goals of asthma therapy were being met, as outlined in the GINA guidelines [4] and from the history and physical examination. The rating of asthma control was applied across all asthma severity levels. The asthma specialist also indicated on a special form the modification of treatment of asthma as 'stepped down,' 'no change,' or 'stepped up.' In addition, age, gender, age of asthma symptoms, onset, family history of asthmatic patients were recorded.

Statistical analysis

The analysis of internal consistency reliability of the five-item ACT was conducted among all the patients recruited for the study. ANOVA testing was used to compare ACT means across groups differing in asthma control with specialists' rating of control and with treatment modification; a P -value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to compare and contrast the ability of the independent variables to screen for subjects with poorly controlled asthma. The accuracy of the ACT depends on how well it can separate the group being tested into those with and without asthma control. Accuracy is measured by the area under the ROC curve. An area of 1 represents a perfect test; an area of 0.5 represents a worthless test.

Nonparametric Spearman's correlation coefficient was conducted between ACT score and specialist's rating ACT score and treatment modification, a P -value of < 0.05 was considered significant.


   Results Top


Forty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 32 ± 14 years, the age of onset of asthma was 13 ± 15 years; there were 15 males (37.5%) and 25 females (62.5%). Family history of asthma was present in 23 patients (57.5%). The mean FEV 1 was 2.7 ± 1.0 L, and the mean ACT score was 15.9 ± 5.8. The mean of physicians' asthma control rating was 3.4 ± 1.0. The internal consistency reliability Alpha was 0.92, indicating a high consistency among the answers to the five different questions of the ACT.

The correlation between means of ACT scores and specialists' ratings of asthma control and treatment modification is presented in [Table - 1],[Table - 2]. Both results were statistically significant, with F = 3.4 ( P = 0.02) and F = 3.6 ( P = 0.037) respectively.

The area under ROC for ACT score was 0.720, whereas the area under ROC for FEV 1 was 0.721 [Figure - 1],[Figure - 2]. Moreover, the area under ROC for both variables (ACT score and FEV 1 ) was 0.766 [Figure - 3].

There was a significant correlation of r = 0.482 between ACT score and specialist's rating ( P = 0.002). In addition, a significant correlation of r = -0.350 also exists between the ACT score and treatment modification ( P = 0.027). However, the correlation between FEV 1 and ACT did not reach a significant level (r = 0.185, P = 0.259).


   Discussion Top


The previous asthma severity classification into intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent or severe persistent is no more recommended. Instead, current guidelines focus more on levels of asthma control and suggest subdividing asthma into controlled, partly controlled, and uncontrolled. [4] Validated tools have been developed to measure asthma control, such as asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), [5] asthma control scoring system, [7] asthma therapy assessment questionnaire (ATAQ), [8] and asthma control test (ACT). [3] The ACT is a short, easy-to-use, and reliable measure of asthma control. [9]

The main finding of this survey is the similarity in the results of validation between the original work for the development of ACT [3] and our work, indicating a strong validation of the Arabic version of the ACT. The internal reliability of the five questions in the ACT survey was 0.92 in our sample, which is very similar to that obtained by Nathan et al. , 0.84, in their development of the ACT through a survey based on a substantially representative sample. [3]

Moderate correlations between the ACT on one hand and the specialists' rating and the treatment modification on the other hand were observed. The highest correlation was observed between the specialist's rating and ACT score (r = 0.48, P = 0.002). These findings are in accordance with those obtained in the original study to validate ACT score. [3]

In the main study, [3] there was a significant correlation between FEV 1 and ACT score (r = 0.19, P = 0.0001). In our study, the correlation between FEV 1 and ACT was not statistically significant (r = 0.18, P = 0.259). This could be explained by the small sample size ( n = 40) in comparison to the original sample, 436 patients. The utility of FEV 1 to reflect asthma control has been questionable, in previous studies. Moy et al. found no significant correlation between FEV 1 and health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire in patients with asthma. [10] Poor correlation was found between asthma rate control and pulmonary function, even in patients with mild-to-moderate uncontrolled asthma in another survey done by Boulet et al. [7]

ACT score provides a greater predictive value in determining the patient's asthma control than does a predicted % FEV 1 value. However, the best measure of control would be a combination of both ACT score and FEV 1 . Our ROC analysis was very similar to the analyses reported by Nathan et al. (0.720 and 0.766). [3] The limitation of this study lies in the small sample size.

In conclusion, the Arabic version of the ACT is a valid tool for Arabic-speaking patients to assess asthma control. ACT score correlates better with asthma specialist's rating of asthma control than with FEV 1 .

 
   References Top

1.Eder W, Ege MJ, von Mutius E. The asthma epidemic. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2226-35.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, Beasley R. The global burden of asthma: Executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee report. Allergy 2004;59:469-78.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test: A survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113:59-65.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2006. Available from: http://www.ginasthma.org.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Juniper EF, Buist AS, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Validation of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chest 1999;115:1265-70.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, Busse WW, Clark TJ, Pauwels RA, et al. Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma Control study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:836-44.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Boulet LP, Boulet V, Milot J. How should we quantify asthma control? A proposal. Chest 2002;122:2217-23.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Vollmer WM, Markson LE, O'Connor E, Sanocki LL, Fitterman L, Berger M, et al. Association of asthma control with health care utilization and quality of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1647-52.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Schatz M, Sorkness CA, Li JT, Marcus P, Murray JJ, Nathan RA, Kosinski M, et al. Asthma Control Test: Reliability, validity and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:549-56.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Moy ML, Israel E, Weiss ST, Juniper EF, Dubι L, Drazen JM, et al. Clinical predictors of health-related quality of life depend on asthma severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:924-9.  Back to cited text no. 10    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2]
 
    Authors' contribution

Lababidi H: Concepts, Design, Definition of intellectual content, Literature search, Clinical studies, Data acquisition, Data analysis, Statistical analysis, Manuscript preparation, Manuscript editing and review
Hijaoui A: Data acquisition
Zarzour M: Definition of intellectual content, Literature search, Data acquisition, Manuscript preparation

This article has been cited by
1 Asthma insights from Jordan: cross-sectional observational study
Basima A. Almomani,Nour A. Al-Sawalha,Shaher M. Samrah,Jacqueline M. Gamble,Miral A. Al Momani
Journal of Asthma. 2016; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Validation of a Spanish version of the childhood asthma control test (SC-ACT) for use in Spain
E.G. Pérez-Yarza,J.A. Castro-Rodriguez,J.R. Villa Asensi,J. Garde Garde,F.J. Hidalgo Bermejo
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition). 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Study the pattern of bronchial asthma among outpatients clinic at Sohag and Akhmeem Chest Hospitals
M. Tag Eldin,K. Wagih,O. Maher
Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Validación de la versión en español de la prueba de control del asma infantil (ACT) para su uso en España
E.G. Pérez-Yarza,J.A. Castro-Rodriguez,J.R. Villa Asensi,J. Garde Garde,F.J. Hidalgo Bermejo
Anales de Pediatría. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Influence of indoor respiratory irritants on the course of bronchial asthma
M. Tageldin,H. Raafat,G. Elassal,W. Salah Eldin
Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Asthma control test via text messaging: could it be a tool for evaluating asthma control?
Mehmet Atilla Uysal,Dilsad Mungan,Arzu Yorgancioglu,Fusun Yildiz,Metin Akgun,Bilun Gemicioglu,Haluk Turktas
Journal of Asthma. 2013; 50(10): 1083
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 The validation of the Turkish version of Asthma Control Test
Mehmet Atilla Uysal,Dilsad Mungan,Arzu Yorgancioglu,Fusun Yildiz,Metin Akgun,Bilun Gemicioglu,Haluk Turktas
Quality of Life Research. 2013; 22(7): 1773
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Improper inhaler technique is associated with poor asthma control and frequent emergency department visits
Hamdan AL-Jahdali,Anwar Ahmed,Abdullah AL-Harbi,Mohd Khan,Salim Baharoon,Salih Bin Salih,Rabih Halwani,Saleh Al-Muhsen
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology. 2013; 9(1): 8
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Improper inhaler technique is associated with poor asthma control and frequent emergency department visits
AL-Jahdali, H. and Ahmed, A. and AL-Harbi, A. and Khan, M. and Baharoon, S. and Bin Salih, S. and Halwani, R. and Al-Muhsen, S.
Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. 2013; 9(1)
[Pubmed]
10 Asthma control: Importance of compliance and inhaler technique assessments
Sawsan Baddar,B Jayakrishnan,Omar A. Al-Rawas
Journal of Asthma. 2013; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Factors Associated With Poor Asthma Control Among Asthmatic Patient Visiting Emergency Department
Anwar E Ahmed,Hamdan AL- Jahdali,Abdullah AL-Harbi,Mohmad Khan,Yosra Ali,Abdullah Al Shimemeri,Salih AL-Muhssen,Rabieh Halwani
The Clinical Respiratory Journal. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Utilization and responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) at the initiation of therapy for patients with asthma: A randomized controlled trial
Al Moamary, M.S. and Al-Kordi, A.G. and Al Ghobain, M.O. and Tamim, H.M.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2012; 12(14)
[Pubmed]
13 The asthma control test (ACT) as an alternative tool to global initiative for asthma (GINA) guideline criteria for assessing asthma control in vietnamese outpatients
Nguyen, V.N. and Chavannes, N. and Le, L.T.T. and Price, D.
Primary Care Respiratory Journal. 2012; 21(1): 85-89
[Pubmed]
14 Asthma outcomes: Composite scores of asthma control
Cloutier, M.M. and Schatz, M. and Castro, M. and Clark, N. and Kelly, H.W. and Mangione-Smith, R. and Sheller, J. and Sorkness, C. and Stoloff, S. and Gergen, P.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2012; 129(3 SUPPL.): S24-S33
[Pubmed]
15 Factors associated with patient visits to the emergency department for asthma therapy
AL-Jahdali, H. and Anwar, A. and AL-Harbi, A. and Baharoon, S. and Halwani, R. and Al Shimemeri, A. and Al-Muhsen, S.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2012; 12(80)
[Pubmed]
16 The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2012 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children
Al-Moamary, M.S. and Alhaider, S.A. and Al-Hajjaj, M.S. and Al-Ghobain, M.O. and Idrees, M.M. and Zeitouni, M.O. and Al-Harbi, A.S. and Al Dabbagh, M.M. and Al-Matar, H. and Alorainy, H.S.
Annals of Thoracic Medicine. 2012; 7(4): 175-204
[Pubmed]
17 Asthma outcomes: Composite scores of asthma control
Michelle M. Cloutier,Michael Schatz,Mario Castro,Noreen Clark,H. William Kelly,Rita Mangione-Smith,James Sheller,Christine Sorkness,Stuart Stoloff,Peter Gergen
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2012; 129(3): S24
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Factors associated with patient visits to the emergency department for asthma therapy
Hamdan AL-Jahdali,Ahmed Anwar,Abdullah AL-Harbi,Salim Baharoon,Rabih Halwani,Abdulllah Al Shimemeri,Saleh Al-Muhsen
BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2012; 12(1): 80
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as an alternative tool to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline criteria for assessing asthma control in Vietnamese outpatients
Vinh Nhu Nguyen,Niels Chavannes,Lan Thi Tuyet Le,David Price
Primary Care Respiratory Journal. 2011; 21(1): 85
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Validation of persian version of asthma control test based on new global initiative for asthma guidelines
Sigari, N. and Sigari, N. and Ghasri, H. and Rahimi, E. and Mohammadi, S.
Tanaffos. 2011; 10(4): 49-53
[Pubmed]
21 Asthma Control Test™ in Assessment of Clinical Asthma Control
Jordan Minov,Jovanka Bislimovska-Karadzhinska,Tatjana Petrova,Kristin Vasilevska,Snezana Risteska-Kuc,Saso Stoleski,Dragan Mijakoski
Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2009; 2(4): 341
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Validation of the Asthma Control Test questionnaire in a North African population
Abdelkader El Hasnaoui,Jennifer Martin,Hocine Salhi,Adam Doble
Respiratory Medicine. 2009; 103: S30
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Levels of acceptance of asthma control test questionnaire among Saudi patients attending 5 tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia
Alanezi, M.O., Al-Jahdali, H.H., Al-Hajjaj, M.S., Zeitoni, M.O., Al-Tasan, T.H.
Saudi Medical Journal. 2009; 30(4): 546-549
[Pubmed]
24 Asthma control test™ in assessment of clinical asthma control
Minov, J., Bislimovska-Karadzhinska, J., Petrova, T., Vasilevska, K., Risteska-Kuc, S., Stoleski, S., Mijakoski, D.
Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2009; 2(4): 341-346
[Pubmed]
25 Validation of the Asthma Control Test questionnaire in a North African population
El Hasnaoui, A., Martin, J., Salhi, H., Doble, A.
Respiratory Medicine. 2009; 103((SUPPL 2)): S30-S37
[Pubmed]
26 The Saudi initiative for asthma
Al-Moamary, M., Al-Hajjaj, M., Idrees, M., Zeitouni, M., Alanezi, M., Al-Jahdal, H., Al Dabbagh, M.
Annals of Thoracic Medicine. 2009; 4(4): 216-233
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (152 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables
    Authors' contribution

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6313    
    Printed271    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded732    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 26    

Recommend this journal